Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  198 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 198 320 Next Page
Page Background

(1) intra-AR structural variation is prevalent and calls into

question the ubiquitous assumption that noncanonical AR

transcripts arise merely as a consequence of alternative

splicing; (2) the majority of splice variant–positive patients

express multiple variants, with AR-V3 being most abun-

dantly expressed; and (3) comprehensive AR profiling will

be necessary to increase our understanding of the molecular

mechanisms underpinning resistance to endocrine treat-

ment.

To investigate the presence of intra-AR structural

variation, we performed targeted sequencing of the entire

AR

gene, including nonrepetitive intronic regions. Structural

variation was detected in 15/30 profiled patients, and the

clustering of focal events towards the 3

0

region of the AR

was striking

( Fig. 3 )

. In turn, 14/15 patients harbouring

intra-AR structural variation also expressed splice variants.

The only intra-AR structural variation–positive patient who

was splice variant–negative rapidly progressed on abir-

aterone treatment. Although we cannot demonstrate a

causal relationship between intra-AR structural variation

and the expression of noncanonical AR transcripts, previous

pioneering work on disease models has demonstrated an

association between intra-AR genomic variation and the

generation of truncated AR transcripts

[24,25,28] .

The majority of cfDNA samples with intra-AR variation

harboured multiple structural AR variants (11/17). Events

were detected that are highly likely to generate a

nonfunctional AR version. Under the evolutionary pressure

of endocrine treatment, diverse somatic AR versions will

emerge. In the context of AR amplifications, multiple AR

versions may exist within the same cell, with nonfunctional

versions existing in parallel with truncated and full-length

AR copies. Interestingly, multiple structural variants were

also detected in 4120-P-2015352, harbouring no amplifica-

tion

( Fig. 3 )

. Therefore, we suggest a model in which

multiple AR versions may emerge either within the same

clone or between different clones as a consequence of

endocrine treatment (Supplementary Fig. 10).

Structural variation was not detected in all ARV-positive

liquid biopsies. It has been shown that in the context of AR

amplification, increased elongation rates leads to genera-

tion of splice variants, which suggests a connection to

processes other than intra-AR structural variation

[19] .

However, as this was a retrospective study, we

generated DNA sequencing libraries from available plasma

aliquots of 1.25 ml. Low DNA input would potentially

limit the power to detect structural variation, especially as

baits applied for enrichment are biased towards the

reference genome (Supplementary Fig. 11). Indeed, to

achieve 95% sensitivity for detection of all variants,

including subclonal events,

>

10 000 coverage would be

needed (Supplementary Fig. 12). As expected, there was

clear coverage bias, whereby samples with detectable intra-

AR variation had higher coverage than negative samples

(Supplementary Fig. 13). Therefore, it is almost certain that

undetected intra-AR variation was due to sequence cover-

age. In addition, as repetitive regions exist in the AR, which

are not possible to enrich and sequence, variants may be

missed if (1) both ends of the structural variant reside

within repetitive regions or (2) one end lies within

repetitive DNA and the other is outside the AR. Of note,

all intra-AR structural variants detected here were classified

as somatic, except the 3.7-kb intron 1 deletion detected in

3883-P-2013569, which was present in germline DNA. At

[(Fig._5)TD$FIG]

1.0

0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

A)

B)

3949 P 2014061

4037 P 2014250

4177 P 2015054

4173 P 2014436

4080 P 2014422

4081 P 2014482

3945 P 2014041

3542 P 2013565

3886 P 2013651

4070 P 2014161

3943 P 2014017

4174 P 2014501

4068 P 2014232

4072 P 2014101

3947 P 2014057

3950 P 2014087

3885 P 2013618

PSA fold change (10–12wk)

AR V

Neg

Pos

+

p

= 0.0057

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0

200

400

Time to NLCB (d)

Progression–free survival

ARV

+

+

Neg

Pos

9

5

3

8

1

0

Pos

Neg

0

200

400

Time to NLCB (d)

ARV

Number at risk by time

*

Fig. 5 – Androgen receptor splice variants (ARVs), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and progression-free survival on hormonal therapy. (A)

Waterfall plots of PSA responses after 10–12 wk on therapy. Dashed and full lines represent 30% and 50% increases and decreases. * PSA increase of

528%. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival, measured as time to no longer of clinical benefit (NLCB) stratified according to ARV

presence in circulating tumour cells at baseline. The log-rank test was used to calculate the

p

value.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 1 9 2 – 2 0 0

198