Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  201 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 201 320 Next Page
Page Background

Platinum Priority – Editorial

Referring to the article published on pp. 192–200 of this issue

Investigating Genomic Aberrations of the Androgen Receptor:

Moving Closer to More Precise Prostate Cancer Care?

Joaquin Mateo, Adam Sharp, Johann S. de Bono

*

[3_TD$DIFF]

The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

In this issue of

European Urology

, De Laere and colleagues

[1]

report on a study profiling the androgen receptor (AR) in

patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate

cancer (mCRPC), evaluating blood-based assays to analyze

serial tumor mRNA and DNA from circulating tumor cells

(CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). In their study, AR

aberrations including point mutations, copy number gains,

structural variations, and alternatively spliced forms of AR

were frequent among mCRPC patients, particularly after

exposure to abiraterone

[4_TD$DIFF]

and enzalutamide; these events

were detectable from plasma samples. This study builds on

published data on AR genomic aberrations and endocrine

therapy resistance.

Persistent AR signaling despite androgen deprivation

therapy (ADT) is an established feature of mCRPC; further

targeting of this pathway results in tumor responses, as

shown with the successful development of abiraterone

acetate and enzalutamide. Yet, not all patients respond to

these drugs, with response duration being limited and

resistance invariably emerging. A number of studies have

associated primary or secondary resistance to abiraterone

and enzalutamide with specific AR aberrations that result in

continued, and ligand-independent, AR transcriptional

activity

( Table 1

).

Henzler et al

[2]

recently found AR structural genomic

rearrangements in up to one-third of mCRPC tumor tissue

samples, identifying intrapatient and interpatient hetero-

geneity, with subclonal enrichment for some of these

events. It has been reported that these AR structural

rearrangements generate AR splice variants; these are

constitutively active despite the absence of androgenic

steroid ligands through retention of the AR N-terminus

(AR-NTD) and associated activation function-1 (AF-1)

essential for hormone-independent AR transactivation

and loss of the regulatory carboxy-terminal ligand-binding

domain (LBD). It has been reported that these AR splice

variants are a key mechanism of resistance to androgen

deprivation therapy.

Previous studies using cfDNA to detect copy-number

changes and hotspot mutations associated the emergence of

AR genomic aberrations with resistance to abiraterone and

enzalutamide

[3,4]

. Similarly, detection of AR splice variants

in CTCs has been related to poor response to endocrine

therapy, but not taxanes, and survival

[5–8]

. While most of

these studies have focused on AR splice variant 7 (AR-V7),

which may not be generated by AR structural rearrange-

ments, several studies show that there are many different

AR splice variants and some of these result in constitutively

active forms that are detectable in CRPC samples.

The use of blood-based assays in this study is clinically

important; if AR genomic aberrations arise after the start of

endocrine therapy, there is a need for assays that are

repeatable and preferably noninvasive. cfDNA may also

allow evaluation of intrapatient heterogeneity of clonal

evolution. It is also important to recognize that these

biomarker studies were largely carried out retrospectively,

utilizing different analytical assays in heterogeneous and

relatively small patient cohorts

( Table 1 )

, so prospective

validation trials are now needed, particularly since the

presence of these biomarkers with resistance to abiraterone

and enzalutamide does not always associate with treatment

resistance, perhaps because of intrapatient heterogeneity

[8]

. Emerging data from preclinical studies also report

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 2 0 1 – 2 0 4

ava ilable at

www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage:

www.eu ropeanurology.com

DOI of original article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.011

.

* Corresponding author. Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, Drug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation

Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK. Tel. +44 208 7224028; fax: +44 208 6427979.

E-mail address:

johann.de-bono@icr.ac.uk

(J.S. de Bono).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.005

0302-2838/

#

2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.