Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  273 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 273 320 Next Page
Page Background

Essential aspects of left-sided thrombectomy include

starting with the patient in the right-side-up position to

address the caval thrombus first, transient vascular control

of the right renal artery and vein while preserving the right

adrenal gland, followed by thrombectomy, caval recon-

struction, and right renal revascularization. We performed

angioembolization 24 hours preoperatively in 80% of our

patients, especially in those with left-sided or larger tumors.

Preoperative renal embolization has been controversial

prior to open surgical IVC thrombectomy, correlated with

increased transfusions, operative time, and postoperative

complications, leading to longer intensive care unit stay and

higher perioperative mortality

[15]

. However, we did not

notice any such downside; rather, it is our impression that

angioinfarction decompressed the venous collaterals, de-

creasing blood loss and enhancing robotic efficacy. Due to

our limited sample size, we are unable to compare

outcomes between those who did and did not undergo

angioembolization.

Our study has limitations. To our knowledge, reported

here is the largest number of robot-assisted level III IVC

thrombectomy cases (

n

= 11) in the literature; nevertheless

it still is a relatively small patient cohort. Also, our median

follow-up of 16

[5_TD$DIFF]

mo is short. We are therefore unable to

report on the long-term oncologic efficacy of robotic

surgery; however, to date the oncologic outcomes have

been sanguine. Given the lack of a comparator open surgical

cohort, we are unable to comment definitively on the

relative merits and demerits of a matched comparison with

open surgery. In this regard, we are currently in the midst of

a retrospective comparison of open and robot-assisted level

II–III IVC thrombectomy.

5.

Conclusions

Our report demonstrates the University of Southern Cali-

fornia technique and clinical outcomes data for robotic level

II–III inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy. Our encour-

aging early experience provides confidence that the requisite

vascular, reconstructive, and oncologic surgical principles

and technical nuances can be reliably and reproducibly

addressed robotically with good clinical outcomes.

Conflicts of interest

Mihir M. Desai declares conflict of interest for Hansen Medical; Auris

Robotics; Procept Biorobotics; Baxter.

Inderbir S. Gill declares conflict of interest for EDAP, Mimic, Hansen

Medical.

Table 1 – Demographic and perioperative data

Variable

Results

Patients,

n

24

Age, yr, median (range)

64 (36–88)

Male,

n

(%)

21 (87.5)

BMI, kg/m

2

, median (range)

28 (22–41.9)

ASA score, median (range)

3 (2–4)

Charlson Comorbidity Index, median (range)

2 (0–6)

Renal tumor

CT size, cm, median (range)

8.5 (5.3–19.5)

Left side,

n

(%)

7 (29.2)

IVC thrombus length, cm, median (range)

4 (2–7)

Mayo IVC thrombus classification level,

n

(%)

II

13 (54.2)

III

11 (45.8)

Preexisting metastasis,

n

(%)

5 (20.8)

Neoadjuvant therapy,

n

(%)

2 (8.3)

*

Preoperative embolization,

n

(%)

20 (80.3)

Operative time, h, median (range)

4.5 (3–8)

Thrombectomy time, h

2.6 (1.3–5)

IVC clamp time, h

0.4 (0.3–1.7)

Nephrectomy time, h

1 (0.3–3)

RPLND time, h

0.5 (0.3–1.5)

Hepatic veins taken, median (range)

1.5 (0–5)

Proximal caval control

Suprarenal IVC

Intrahepatic,

n

(%)

9 (37.5)

EBL, ml, median (range)

240 (100–7000)

Patients receiving intraoperative transfusions,

n

(%)

5 (20.8)

Patients receiving intraoperative bovine pericardial

patch,

n

(%)

1 (4.2)

Lymph nodes removed, median (range)

7 (1–22)

Lymph nodes positive, median (range)

0 (0–22)

Intraoperative complications,

n

0

Positive surgical margins,

n

0

Length of hospital stay, d, median (range)

4 (1–22)

ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI = body mass index;

CT = computed tomography; EBL = estimated blood loss; IVC = inferior

vena cava; RPLND = retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

*

One patient underwent tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for 3 mo; one

patient underwent partial nephrectomy.

Table 2 – Pathology and follow-up data

Variable

Results

Patients,

n

24

Histology,

n

(%)

Renal cell carcinoma

23 (95.8)

Papillary type II

1 (4.2)

Tumor grade,

n

(%)

2

7 (29.2)

3

11 (45.8)

4

6 (25.0)

Stage,

n

(%)

T3a

5 (20.9)

T3b

14 (58.3)

T3c

2 (8.3)

T4a

3 (12.5)

Positive lymph nodes,

n

(%)

3 (12.5)

No. of patients with 1-yr Clavien complications,

n

(%)

4 (16.7)

2

2 (8.3)

*

3a

1 (4.2)

y

3b

1 (4.2)

z

Cancer status

Disease free

13 (54.2)

Recurrence

11 (45.8)

Patient status,

n

(%)

Alive

24 (100)

Dead

0

Adjuvant therapy,

n

(%)

10 (41.7)

Follow-up, mo, median (range)

16 (12–39)

*

Pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis (treated with nadroparin;

occurred within 90 d after surgery).

y

Chylous ascites.

z

Percutaneous drainage of subphrenic abscess.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 2 6 7 – 2 7 4

273