Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  291 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 291 320 Next Page
Page Background

received an extended lymph node dissection. Ten patients

(91%) had nodal invasion and eight patients (73%; 95% CI,

41–95%) had positive margins at final pathology. Adjuvant

ADT and radiotherapy were administered to 10 (91%) and 7

(64%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up for patients

who did not experience CSMwas 63 mo (95% CI, 48–77 mo).

At 7-yr follow-up, 11.1% patients received salvage radio-

therapy. The 7-yr clinical progression- and CSM-free

survival rates were 45% (95% CI, 30–85%) and 82% (95%

CI, 62–99%), respectively

( Fig. 1 )

.

The prognosis for men with disseminated metastatic

disease substantially differs compared with those with PCa

limited to the skeleton or the lymph nodes, and a chance of

cure in the latter group might exist

[9–12]

. Although the

exact definition of oligometastatic PCa is still debated, these

two categories (polymetastatic vs oligometastatic patients)

could represent biologically different entities. In particular,

patients with oligometastatic disease might harbor an

intermediate state of progression between localized tumor

and widespread metastases

[14]

. Removal of the primary

tumor in this setting could delay progression and eventually

affect oncologic outcomes. The rationale for local treatment

in metastatic PCa is supported by preclinical studies

showing that removal of the primary tumor could eliminate

the source of cytokines that facilitate the spread of

metastatic cells. Local treatment could also reduce tumor

burden, improving response to systemic therapies. The

elimination of the principal source of metastatic cells could

limit the proliferation of more aggressive subpopulations of

cancer cells

[1,15]

. This evidence together with observation

in metastatic patients affected by other diseases led to the

hypothesis that RP might provide an oncologic benefit in

oligometastatic PCa

[1,3–6]

. Population-based studies

demonstrated that metastatic patients who received RP

had improved oncologic outcomes compared with those

who did not receive local treatment

[3,6]

. Moreover, a

recent multi-institutional study evaluating men with

metastatic PCa reported acceptable perioperative and

oncologic outcomes, in which almost 90% of patients did

not die from the disease itself at 2-yr follow-up

[5] .

Never-

theless, these studies are limited by short follow-up and by

their observational nature, and details on the number and

sites of metastases and on additional cancer therapies were

not always present

[1]

.

Our investigation focused on a highly selected cohort with

available data on the number and sites of metastases and on

the use of additional cancer therapies. Surgery was

performed in well-selected patients without relevant

comorbidities, according to the clinical judgment of the

treating physician, even in the absence of data supporting the

safety and efficacy of RP in the oligometastatic setting at the

beginning of the study. Nonetheless, observations coming

from preclinical studies

[7]

together with evidence support-

ing a rationale for the removal of the primary tumor in

patients with nodal metastases

[16]

led to the hypothesis

that RP might play a role in highly selected patients with

oligometastatic PCa. Surgery was associated with an

acceptable safety profile: Only two patients experienced

grade 3 complications, and no perioperative mortality was

recorded. However, intraoperative blood loss, complications,

transfusions, and LOS were higher compared with

[8_TD$DIFF]

what

observed in patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa

treated at our institution

[17]

. Among patients with

nonmetastatic PCa treated at our center, for example, only

6.2% and 14.8% experienced postoperative complications and

blood transfusions, respectively. Similarly, we observed

substantially shorter median LOS (8 d) compared with the

metastatic scenario

[17] .

Consequently, RP in oligometastatic

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Fig. 1 – Kaplan-Meier analyses assessing the time from surgery to clinical progression (a) and cancer-specific mortality (b) in patients with

[6_TD$DIFF]

oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

CSM = cancer-specific mortality.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 2 8 9 – 2 9 2

291