Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  286 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 286 320 Next Page
Page Background

The simplest MRI-targeted biopsy strategy is the

cognitive approach, which directs visually targeted samples

to the suspicious ROI highlighted on mpMRI. Three RCTs

have compared a first biopsy pathway based on mpMRI to

12-core SB alone,

producing conflicting results

[8,21,22] .

The first two studies concluded that the PCa DR

was higher in the mpMRI group

[21,22]

. In the most recent

RCT, the authors reported that the mpMRI group had

comparable DRs of PCa and csPCa compared with the

control group

[8]

.

MRI/TRUS fusion software-based TB represents the most

accurate and practical TB strategy

[23]

. One RCT that used

fusion biopsy in a diagnostic pathway based on mpMRI was

published

[9]

. In the mpMRI group, two-core fusion biopsy

of mpMRI–suspected lesions and 12-core SB were per-

formed. No significant differences were detected between

the mpMRI and control groups (12-core SB) in either the PCa

DR (59.0% vs 54.0%, respectively) or the csPCa DR (44.0% vs

49.0%, respectively). In contrast, some nonrandomized

studies comparing MRI-targeted biopsy and SB in biopsy-

naı¨ve men have concluded that the approach using mpMRI

and subsequent fusion biopsy limited overdetection of

clinically insignificant PCa while providing greater detec-

tion of csPCa than SB alone

[24–28] .

To our knowledge, this study was the first RCT

comparing PCa DRs between a diagnostic pathway, based

on mpMRI and subsequent MRI/TRUS fusion software-

guided TB alone, with the standard pathway, based on SB, in

a cohort of biopsy-naı¨ve men.

The first report of our RCT seemed to confirm the

potential role of mpMRI as a first-line technique in the

diagnostic pathway of biopsy-naı¨ve patients with suspected

PCa, according to our inclusion criteria.

PCa was diagnosed in 50.5% of patients in the mpMRI

group, with 87.0% of cases being clinically significant. These

data significantly outperformed the results of the standard

pathway. In this group, the overall DR of PCa was 29.5%,

similar to the results of previously published series of SB in

biopsy-naı¨ve patients

[29]

. We emphasize that the present

study was restricted to patients with PSA levels 15 ng/ml

and negative DRE results only.

The differences in PCa DRs between the arms of the study

were greater than those found in earlier RCTs

[8,9] ,

perhaps

owing to the different protocols used (cognitive biopsy

[8]

,

two-core fusion biopsy

[9]

) and the patient selection

criteria.

When stratifying the population in terms of the

approach to biopsy, we found that TB in arm A MRI+ had

the best results in terms of the overall DR of PCa (60.5%) and

the DR of csPCa (93.9%). The analysis in the different

subgroups might have been affected by the underpowered

sample size.

The usefulness of the PI-RADS classification was

emphasized by our findings: a significantly higher DR

was found in terms of overall detection of PCa and csPCa in

lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 and 5 than in those with a

PI-RADS score of 3. The results in

Table 4

suggested

that lesions with a PI-RADS score of 3 might not receive

biopsy, although they were all diagnosed as csPCa after

biopsy.

The pathologic results confirmed the superiority of the

mpMRI pathway in terms of the quality of biopsy samples.

Fewer biopsy samples per patient were necessary in arm A

than in arm B. The median total, maximum CCL, and

maximum CCI were significantly higher in arm A than in

arm B.

Table 4 – Histopathologic characteristics of the study population

Arm A, mpMRI group

Arm B, control group

p

value

Group size,

n

107

105

PCa, no. (%)

54 (50.5)

31 (29.5)

0.002

Biopsy GS, no. (%)

6

10 (18.5)

17 (54.8)

0.002

7

38 (70.4)

11 (35.5)

8

5 (9.3)

2 (6.5)

>

8

1 (1.9)

1 (3.2)

Total CCL, mm

16 (8–31)

5 (2–20)

0.005

Maximum CCL, mm

7 (5–9)

4 (2–8)

0.013

Maximum CCI, %

60 (33–77)

25 (14–67)

0.010

TB

SB, arm A

SB, arm B

p

value

Group size,

n

81

26

105

PCa, no. (%)

49 (60.5)

5 (19.2)

31 (29.5)

<

0.001

Biopsy GS, no. (%)

6

5 (10.2)

5 (100)

17 (54.8)

7

38 (77.6)

0 (0)

11 (35.5)

<

0.001

8

5 (10.2)

0 (0)

2 (6.5)

>

8

1 (2.0)

0 (0)

1 (3.2)

Total CCL, mm

18 (10–32)

3 (2–3)

5 (2–20)

0.048

Maximum CCL, mm

8 (6–10)

2 (1–3)

4 (2–8)

0.064

Maximum CCI, %

67 (33–80)

10 (9–25)

25 (14–67)

0.062

CCI = cancer core invasion; CCL = cancer core length; GS = Gleason score; mpMRI = multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; SB = standard biopsy;

TB = targeted biopsy.

Data for continuous variables are presented as the median (interquartile range).

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 2 8 2 – 2 8 8

286