patients might be associated with worse perioperative
outcomes compared with the nonmetastatic setting. This
might be related to disease aggressiveness and thus to the
need for more extensive local and nodal dissection. It should
also be highlighted that all patients included in the current
study were treated with open surgery; therefore, we were
not able to evaluate the potential perioperative benefits
associated with minimally invasive approaches in men with
oligometastatic PCa
[18].
When considering oncologic outcomes, our cohort had
median follow-up of 63 mo, which represents the longest
available follow-up assessing the role of surgery in this
context. Of note, RP with extended nodal dissection
administered in a multimodal setting was associated with
acceptable long-term results in which only one of two
patients experienced clinical recurrence and one of five had
died from PCa at 7-yr follow-up. We should highlight that
virtually all patients treated in our cohort received ADT
before and/or after surgery and that the majority received
postoperative radiotherapy. Consequently, RP could poten-
tially represent an option only when considered in a
multimodal setting. Unfortunately, the lack of a control
group of oligometastatic patients not receiving local
treatment prevented us from comprehensively assessing
the oncologic benefit associated with RP. Nevertheless, the
long-term disease-free survival observed in our study was
higher than that observed in men managed with ADT alone,
for whom the 5-yr CSM-free survival rates ranged between
48% and 55%
[3,6].
[9_TD$DIFF]
Randomized
[10_TD$DIFF]
controlled
[11_TD$DIFF]
trials
[12_TD$DIFF]
will
[13_TD$DIFF]
help
[14_TD$DIFF]
clarify
[15_TD$DIFF]
the
[16_TD$DIFF]
role
[17_TD$DIFF]
of
[18_TD$DIFF]
local
[19_TD$DIFF]
treatment in
[2_TD$DIFF]
the
[20_TD$DIFF]
metastatic
[21_TD$DIFF]
scenario
[22_TD$DIFF]
[1] .Moreover,
[4_TD$DIFF]
the
[23_TD$DIFF]
inclusion of a
[24_TD$DIFF]
small group
[25_TD$DIFF]
of
[26_TD$DIFF]
highly
[27_TD$DIFF]
selected
[28_TD$DIFF]
patients
[29_TD$DIFF]
resulted
[30_TD$DIFF]
in
[31_TD$DIFF]
wide
[32_TD$DIFF]
confidence
[33_TD$DIFF]
intervals
[34_TD$DIFF]
and
[35_TD$DIFF]
might
[36_TD$DIFF]
limit the
[37_TD$DIFF]
generalizability
[38_TD$DIFF]
of
[39_TD$DIFF]
our findings.
In conclusion, we reported perioperative and long-term
oncologic outcomes of RP in a highly selected cohort of
patients with bone metastases. Our findings support the
safety of RP in this setting.
Author contributions:
Alberto Briganti had full access to all the data in
the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the
accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design:
Briganti, Rigatti, Montorsi.
Acquisition of data:
Stabile, Bandini.
Analysis and interpretation of data:
Gandaglia, Briganti, Montorsi.
Drafting of the manuscript:
Gandaglia, Briganti, Montorsi.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content:
Briganti, Montorsi.
Statistical analysis:
Gandaglia, Fossati.
Obtaining funding:
None.
Administrative, technical, or material support:
None.
Supervision:
Montorsi, Briganti.
Other (specify):
None.
Financial disclosures:
Alberto Briganti certifies that all conflicts of
interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and
affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the
manuscript (eg, employment/ affiliation, grants or funding, consultan-
cies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties,
or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: None.
Funding/Support and role of the sponsor:
None.
References
[1]
Bayne CE, Williams SB, Cooperberg MR, et al. Treatment of the primary tumor in metastatic prostate cancer: current concepts and future perspectives. Eur Urol 2016;69:775–87.[2]
Gandaglia G, De Lorenzis E, Novara G, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with locally-advanced prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2017;71:249–56.[3]
Culp SH, Schellhammer PF, Williams MB. Might men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer benefit from definitive treatment of the primary tumor?. A SEER-based study. Eur Urol 2014;65: 1058–66.
[4]
Heidenreich A, Pfister D, Porres D. Cytoreductive radical prostatec- tomy in patients with prostate cancer and low volume skeletal metastases: results of a feasibility and case-control study. J Urol 2015;193:832–8.[5]
Sooriakumaran P, Karnes J, Stief C, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes in 106 men who underwent radical prostatectomy for distant metastatic prostate cancer at presentation. Eur Urol 2016;69:788–94.[6]
Gratzke C, Engel J, Stief CG. Role of radical prostatectomy in clinically non-organ-confined prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2014;15:455.[7]
Kadmon D, Heston WD, Fair WR. Treatment of a metastatic prostate derived tumor with surgery and chemotherapy. J Urol 1982;127: 1238–42.
[8]
Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Dell’Oglio P, et al. Rationale for local treatment in the management of metastatic prostate cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2016;10:266–72.
[9]
Gandaglia G, Sun M, Trinh QD, et al. Survival benefit of definitive therapy in patients with clinically advanced prostate cancer: esti- mations of the number needed to treat based on competing-risks analysis. BJU Int 2014;114:E62–9.[10]
Ost P, Decaestecker K, Lambert B, et al. Prognostic factors influenc- ing prostate cancer-specific survival in non-castrate patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate 2014;74:297–305.
[11]
Halabi S, Kelly WK, Ma H, et al. Meta-analysis evaluating the impact of site of metastasis on overall survival in men with castration- resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:1652–9.
[12]
Halabi S, Lin CY, Kelly WK, et al. Updated prognostic model for predicting overall survival in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:671–7.
[13]
Gandaglia G, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, et al. Impact of the site of metastases on survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2015;68:325–34.
[14]
Conde Moreno AJ, Ferrer Albiach C, Muelas Soria R, Gonzalez Vidal V, Garcia Gomez R, Albert Antequera M. Oligometastases in pros- tate cancer: restaging stage IV cancers and new radiotherapy options. Radiat Oncol 2014;9:258.
[15]
Kim MY, Oskarsson T, Acharyya S, et al. Tumor self-seeding by circulating cancer cells. Cell 2009;139:1315–26.
[16]
Engel J, Bastian PJ, Baur H, et al. Survival benefit of radical prosta- tectomy in lymph node-positive patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2010;57:754–61.
[17]
Gandaglia G, Suardi N, Fossati N, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Eur Urol Suppl 2015;14:e621.[18]
Gandaglia G, Sammon JD, Chang SL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in the postdisse- mination era. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1419–26.
E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 2 8 9 – 2 9 2
292




