Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  284 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 284 320 Next Page
Page Background

The biopsy Gleason score (GS), number of total and positive

cores, total and maximum cancer core length (CCL), and maximum

cancer core invasion (CCI) rate were recorded according to the

Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START)

criteria

[16]

.

Clinically significant PCa was defined according to previously

published studies: the START criteria for TB (biopsy GS 7 or

maximum CCL 5 mm)

[16,17]

and the updated Epstein criteria for

SB

[18] .

2.6.

Sample size determination and statistical analyses

A sample size of 186 patients (93 per arm) was required to detect a 20%

absolute increase (from 30% to 50% with arm B vs arm A, respectively) in

the DR of PCa, with an

a

error of 0.05 and a

b

error of 0.20 (two-sample

test for proportions, superiority design). Considering 10% of patients lost

to follow-up, the total sample size needed was 205 patients. No interim

analyses were planned, and all procedures were performed on an

intention-to-treat basis.

The associations between categorical variables (PI-RADS score and

GS) and the arm were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test; Mann-Whitney

and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for continuous variables. All of the

results for continuous variables are expressed as the median

(interquartile range [IQR]). All of the reported

p

values were obtained

by the two-sided exact method at the conventional 5% significance

level. Data were analyzed as of April 2016 by R software v.3.2.3

(R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), according

to previously published guidelines for the reporting of statistics

[19] .

3.

Results

Totals of 111 and 112 patients were enrolled in arms A and B,

respectively. Protocol violations were registered in 4 of

111 patients (3.6%) and 7 of 112 patients (6.3%) in arms A and

B, respectively. After exclusion of these patients, 107 and

105 patients per arm were evaluable in arms A and B,

respectively. The patients’ demographics are reported in

Table 1

.

3.1.

Comparison between arm A and arm B

As reported in

Table 2

, there was a significant difference

between arms A and B in the overall DRs of PCa (50.5% vs

29.5%, respectively;

p

= 0.002) and csPCa (43.9% vs 18.1%,

respectively;

p

<

0.001).

3.2.

Comparison between targeted and standard biopsy

In arm A, mpMRI was positive in 81 patients (75.7%) who

underwent TB and negative in 26 patients (24.3%) who

underwent SB. A significant difference was recorded when

stratifying the patients on the basis of the biopsy approach,

that is, TB, SB in arm A, and SB in arm B, in terms of the

overall DRs of PCa (60.5% vs 19.2% vs 29.5%, respectively;

p

<

0.001) and csPCa (56.8% vs 3.8% vs 18.1%, respectively;

p

<

0.001)

( Table 2

).

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Fig. 1 – Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram of the study.

mpMRI = multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 2 8 2 – 2 8 8

284