235 320
[32]
Miller S, Taylor A, Ahmad R, et al. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithot- omy in the treatment of adult renal nephrolithiasis: a single institution experience. BJU Int 2014;113:S352–3.[33]
Zimmermanns V, Kurzidim S, Liske P, Lahme S. Minimal invasive PCNL (MPCNL)—proven efficiency and safety after more than 650 consecutive patients. Eur Urol Suppl 2012;11:e1035.[34]
Tepeler A, Sarica K. Standard, mini, ultra-mini, and micro percuta- neous nephrolithotomy: what is next?. A novel labeling system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to the size of the access sheath used during procedure. Urolithiasis 2013;41:367–8.[35]
Schilling D, Husch T, Bader M, et al. Nomenclature in PCNL or the Tower Of Babel: a proposal for a uniform terminology. World J Urol 2015;33:1905–7.[36]
Nagele U, Horstmann M, Sievert KD, et al. A newly designed Amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in-vitro pressure- measurement and microscopic study. J Endourol 2007;21: 1113–6.[37]
Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, et al. Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemo- static sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement. Urology 2006;68:489–93.[38]
Lahme S, Bichler KH, Strohmaier WL, Gotz T. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 2001;40:619.[39]
Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Chen W, Wu W. A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. BioMed Res Int 2013;2013:490793.[40]
Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M. The ‘‘all- seeing needle’’: initial results of an optical puncture system con- firming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2011;59:1054–9.[41]
Nicklas AP, Schilling D, Bader MJ, et al. The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. World J Urol 2015;33:1847–53.[42]
Mager R, Balzereit C, Gust K, et al. The hydrodynamic basis of the vacuum cleaner effect in continuous-flow PCNL instruments: an empiric approach and mathematical model. World J Urol 2016;34:717–24.
[43]
Nagele U, Nicklas A. Vacuum cleaner effect, purging effect, active and passive wash out: a new terminology in hydrodynamic stone retrieval is arising—does it affect our endourologic routine? World J Urol 2016;34:143–4.[44]
Li LY, Gao X, Yang M, et al. Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to less invasiveness?. A prospective comparative study. Urology 2010;75:56–61.[45]
Traxer O, S mith 3rd TG, Pearle MS, Corwin TS, Saboorian H, Cadeddu JA. Renal parenchymal injury after standard and mini percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 2001;165:1693–5.
[46]
Zhong Q, Zheng C, Mo J, Piao Y, Zhou Y, Jiang Q. Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. J Endourol 2013;27:420–6.[47]
Borin JF, Sala LG, Eichel L, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy using hemostatic gelatin matrix. J Endourol 2005;19:614–7.[48]
Uribe CA, Eichel L, Khonsari S, et al. What happens to hemostatic agents in contact with urine? An in vitro study. J Endourol 2005;19:312–7.[49]
Abdelhafez MF, Bedke J, Amend B, et al. Minimally invasive percu- taneous nephrolitholapaxy (PCNL) as an effective and safe proce- dure for large renal stones. BJU Int 2012;110:E1022–6.[50]
Nagele U, Schilling D, Sievert KD, Stenzl A, KuczykM. Management of lower-pole stones of 0.8 to 1.5 cm maximal diameter by the mini- mally invasive percutaneous approach. J Endourol 2008;22:1851–3.
[51]
De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2015;67:125–37.[52]
Fawzi AM, Sakr AMN, Youssef MK, et al. Minimally invasive percu- taneous nephrolithotomy versus standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single center experience. Eur Urol Suppl 2015;14:e584.[53]
Knoll T, Jessen JP, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G. Flexible ureteror- enoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10- 30 m m size. World J Urol 2011;29:755–9.
[54]
Zhong W, Zhao Z, Wang L, Swami S, Zeng G. Percutaneous-based management of staghorn calculi in solitary kidney: combined mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal sur- gery. Urol Int 2015;94:70–3.
[55]
Ozturk U, Sener NC, Goktug HNG, Nalbant I, Gucuk A, Imamoglu MA. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10-20 m m. Urol Int 2013;91:345–9.[56]
Zeng G, Jia J, Zhao Z, Wu W, Zhao Z, Zhong W. Treatment of renal stones in infants: comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Res 2012;40: 599–603.
[57]
Yan X, Al-Hayek S, Gan W, Zhu W, Li X, Guo H. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in preschool age children with kidney calculi (including stones induced by melamine-contaminat- ed milk powder). Pediatr Surg Int 2012;28:1021–4.
[58]
Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar R, Jha SK, Singh H. A single center experience comparingminiperc and shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of radiopaque 1-2 cm lower caliceal renal calculi in chil- dren: a prospective randomized study. J Endourol 2015;29:805–9.
[59]
Nagele U, Walcher U, Bader M, Herrmann T, Kruck S, Schilling D. Flow matters 2: how to improve irrigation flow in small-calibre percutaneous procedures—the purging effect. World J Urol 2015;33:1607–11.[60]
Deters LA, Jumper CM, Steinberg PL, P ais Jr VM. Evaluating the definition of ‘‘stone free status’’ in contemporary urologic litera- ture. Clin Nephrol 2011;76:354–7.[61]
Ghani K, Alruwaily A, Rogers M, et al. The natural history of asymptomatic renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analy- sis. J Urol 2015;1:e1108–9.
[62]
Dehong C, Liangren L, Huawei L, QiangW. A comparison among four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 2013;41:523–30.[63]
Guo HQ, Shi HL, Li XG, et al. [Relationship between the intrapelvic perfusion pressure in minimally invasive percutaneous nephro- lithotomy and postoperative recovery]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2008;46:52–4.[64]
Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K, Li X, Chen W, Yang H. Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol 2008;22:2147–51.[65]
Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK. Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 2007;21:684–7.
E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 2 2 0 – 2 3 5
235