Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  191 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 191 320 Next Page
Page Background

[3]

HashimA, Bosaily A-S, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi- parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 2017;389(10071): 815–22

.

[4]

Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. The diagnostic performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 for detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2017;72:177–88

.

[5]

Futterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, et al. Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic reso- nance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 2015;68:1045–53.

[6]

Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012;22:746–57.

[7]

Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 2016;69: 16–40

.

[8]

Rosenkrantz AB, Lim RP, Haghighi M, Somberg MB, Babb JS, Taneja SS. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the Pros- tate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:W612–8

.

[9]

Puech P, Randazzo M, Ouzzane A, et al. How are we going to train a generation of radiologists (and urologists) to read prostate MRI? Curr Opin Urol 2015;25:522–35

.

[10]

Gupta RT, Spilseth B, Froemming AT. How and why a generation of radiologists must be trained to accurately interpret prostate mpMRI. Abdom Radiol 2016;41:803–4.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 1 8 9 – 1 9 1

191