Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  212 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 212 320 Next Page
Page Background

Table 4 – Reported outcomes per study—baseline characteristics

Author

Surgical

technique

Patients

(

n

)

Subgroup

(

n

)

Gender

(m/f)

Age (yr)

Weight

(kg)

BMI

(kg/m

2

[1_TD$DIFF]

)

Living/cadaveric

donor

Operative

time (min)

Cold

ischemic

time (h)

Warm

ischemic

time (min)

Gibson incision

Nanni (2005)

[7]

GIBI

100

50 34/16 45 9

74 13 NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Oberholzer (2013)

[14]

GIBI

56

28 11/17 49.8 10.8

NR 38.1 5.4

*

26/2

NR

2.0 4.5

49.2 25.2

Modi (2013)

[13]

GIBI

217

145 126/19 35.9 (11–62)

NR 22.3 (16.9–30.5)

145/–

175.7 [75–265]

0.79 (0.23–1.6)

*

30.3 (19–53)

*

Hockey-stick incision

Nanni (2005)

[7]

HSI

100

50 35/15 46 12

72 14 NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Filocamo (2007)

[34] a

HSI

400

267 174/93 Group 1: 47 (15–63),

group 2: 45 (18–60),

group 3: 55 (17–71)

a

NR Combined: 27,4 3.3

a N

R

NR

NR

NR

Malinka (2013)

[33]

HSI

66

33 20/13 51.4 11.6

NR 26.3 4.4

10/23

188.7 55.9

7.75 5.77

32.5 8.6

Kishore (2014)

[9]

HSI

50

25 20/5 34 11

NR 21 3.1

NR

NR

NR

NR

Conventional open

kidney transplantation

b

Øyen (2006)

[35]

COKT

42

21 17/4 55 (18–78)

NR 24.4 (18–33)

5/16

187 (130–270)

*

14.3 (7–22)

NR

M

un (2007)

[18]

COKT

40

20 NR

40.1 (32–52)

NR 35.5 (26.9–38.2)

*

20/–

159 (129–205)

NR

NR

Kacar (2013)

[37]

COKT

86

43 28/15 42.7

NR 25.9

41/2

153.5

1.06

NR

Brockschmidt (2014)

[20] C

OKT

22

11 NR

41.1 12.9 (21–64)

NR 24.2 3.5 (19.8–30.5) 11/–

111 16 (90–145)

1.28 0.48

(0.67–2.22)

*

AT: 26 5.4 (17–38)

c

Modi (2015)

[22]

COKT

36

8 –/8

37.5 17.3

NR 20.7 2.12

8/–

179.4 36.88

*

0.83 0.26

*

36.48 6.4

*

Kim (2016)

[21]

COKT

452

435 271/164 43.6 11.0

NR 22.98 3.76

435/0

NR

NR

NR

Minimally invasive open

kidney transplantation

Øyen (2006)

[35]

MIKT

42

21 18/3 56 (32–75)

NR 25.7 (21–32)

5/16

118 (95–140)

*

13.4 (7–21)

NR

Filocamo (2007)

[34

]

MLI

400

133 84/49 54 (18–60)

NR 28.2 2.0

NR

NR

NR

NR

Mun (2007)

[18]

MIVAKT

40

20 NR

36.8 (18–45)

NR 29.7 (25.6–34.1)

*

20/–

178 (156–210)

NR

NR

Park (2008)

[36]

MSI

5

5 –/5

24 3.6

NR 17.5 2.5

NR

Not significant, NS

NR

NR

Brockschmidt (2012)

[19] M

AKT

10

10 NR

47 14.7

NR 25 2.02 (23–30)

NR

126.2 27.5 (90–165) 14.4 6.4

(1.8–24)

AT: 27.7 8.4 (19–45)

c

Kacar (2013)

[37]

MIKT

86

43 32/11 39.5

NR 23.8

42/1

164.2

1.01

NR

Malinka (2013)

[33

]

STI

66

33 26/7 54.5 12.6

NR 25.2 4.6

7/26

194.4 50.5

7.97 4.33

34.6 12.3

Brockschmidt (2014)

[20] M

AKT

22

11 NR

40.1 11.7 (25–61)

NR 24.8 5.6 (19.5–32.4) 11/–

121 11.9 (102–141) 1.9 0.37 (1–2.33)

* A

T: 27 6.2 (19–37)

c

Kishore (2014)

[9]

M

FI

50

25 20/5 38 9

NR 20 2.9

NR

NR

NR

NR

Kim (2016)

[21]

MSI

452

17 0/17 26.5 9.3

NR 18.72 2.47

17/0

NS

NR

NR

Laparoscopic kidney

transplantation

Modi (2013)

[13]

LKT (suprapubic)

217

72 63/9 34.4 (16–64)

NR 20.5 (14.3–33)

72/–

223.8 (160–325)

1.77 (0.43–3.82)

*

60.3 (47–90)

*

Modi (2015)

[22]

LKT (suprapubic)

36

20 –/20 33.90 11.08

NR 20.41 5.09

20/–

224.75 31.89

1.57 0.73

67.15 17.73

Modi (2015)

[22]

LKT (transvaginal)

36

8 –/8

35.3 8.24

NR 19.8 4.24

8/–

242.1 31.9

*

1.63 0.81

*

62.90 9.93

*

Robotic-assisted kidney

transplantation

Oberholzer (2013)

[14]

RAKT

56

23 13/15 47.9 10.7

NR 42.6 7.8

* [6_TD$DIFF]

26/2

NR

2.8 3.6

47.7 7.8

Menon (2014)

[15]

RAKT

25

25 17/8 37.2 15.8 (16–67)

NR 24.1 4.8 (17.4–38.6) 25/–

214.1 39.8 (156–293) NR

2.4 1.1 (1.5–6.0),

rewarming time

with ice slush

46.6 9.3 (27–66),

total rewarming

time 75.3 19.2

(50.7–142.5)

c

Tsai (2014)

[16]

RAKT

10

10 5/5

43.6 13.8 (21–61)

NR 22.8 3.5 (18.9–28.2) 6/4

257.8 52.7 (187–341) NR

NR

Sood (2015)

[17]

RAKT

54

54 41/13 37.3 13.5 (16–67)

NR 23.5 4.8 (15.5–42.3) 54/–

201.1 33.8 (156–293) 0.46 0.26

(0.17–1.5)

In donor

2.3 0.8 (1.3–6.0),

rewarming

time including

ice slush

time 42.9 7.6

(27–66)

c

Tugcu (2016)

[30]

RAKT

15

15 7/8

37.4 10.8

NR 22.6 3.4

15/–

300.3 104.2

NR

1.9 0.5,

rewarming time

including ice slush

time 73.3 30.7

c

NR = not reported; NS = not specified; AT = anastomosis time; GIBI = Gibson incision; HSI = hockey-stick incision; MLI = midline incision; COKT = conventional open kidney transplantation; MIKT = minimally invasive

kidney transplantation; MIVAKT = minimally invasive video-assisted kidney transplantation; MSI = modified skin incision technique; MAKT = minimal-access kidney transplantation; MFI = modified Pfannenstiel incision;

LKT = laparoscopic kidney transplantation; RAKT = robotic-assisted kidney transplantation; KTx = kidney transplantation surgery; STI = short transverse incision; = standard deviation; (–) = range.

*

Significant result (

p

<

0.05).

a

Three subgroups: group 1: 1991–1997, operated by surgeons (

n

= 65); group 2: 1991–1997, operated by urologists (

n

= 67); group 3: 1997–2005, operated by surgeons (

n

= 135), when possible results were combined.

b

Conventional open kidney transplantation, not specified which open technique, either being KTx with GIBI or KTx with HSI.

c

Different definitions of warm ischemic time were used. When not reported as anastomosis time + warm ischemic time during nephrectomy, time was reported separately.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 2 0 5 – 2 1 7

212