Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  319 320 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 319 320 Next Page
Page Background for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database. Int Urol Nephrol 2016;48:1571–6

.

[5]

Boone T. How to decide whether an AUS or male sling is best for male stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2016;196:641–2

.

[6]

Rehder P, Haab F, Cornu JN, et al. Treatment of postprostatectomy male urinary incontinence with the transobturator retroluminal repositioniong sling suspension: 3 year follow-up. Eur Urol 2012; 62:140–5.

[7] Hu¨ sch T, Kretschmer A, Thomsen et al. Risk factors for failure of

male slings and artificial urinary sphincters: results from a large

Middle European cohort study. Urol Int. In press.

http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1159/000449232

.

Emilio Rios

a,

*

, Luis Martinez-Pin˜eiro

b

a

Urology Unit, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, Madrid, Spain

b

Urology Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

*Corresponding author. Urology Unit, Hospital Universitario Infanta

Sofia, Avda de Europa 34, San Sebastian de los Reyes.

Madrid 28702, Spain.

E-mail address:

erios00@hotmail.com

(E. Rios).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.015

#

2017 European Association of Urology.

Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Re: Radiation With or Without Antiandrogen Therapy in

Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Shipley WU, Seiferheld W, Lukka HR, et al

N Engl J Med 2017;376:417–28

Experts’ summary:

The authors conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled

trial of 24 mo of bicalutamide in addition to 64.8 Gy salvage

radiation therapy (SRT) of the prostate bed in patients with

prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical pros-

tatectomy (RTOG 9601). Between 1998 and 2003, a total of

760 eligible patients were enrolled; the primary endpoint was

overall survival.

Notably, 90

[1_TD$DIFF]

patients (11.8%) had a PSA nadir after surgery

of 0.5 ng/ml. While 405 patients (53.3%) had a PSA level at

trial entry of

<

0.7 ng/ml, the PSA level at trial entry was 0.7–

1.5 ng/ml in 237 patients (31.2%) and

>

1.5–4.0 ng/ml in

118 patients (15.5%).

The 12-yr overall survival rate was significantly im-

proved by addition of bicalutamide (76.3% vs 71.3%; hazard

ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.99;

p

= 0.04). Furthermore, the cumulative incidence of meta-

static prostate cancer was significantly reduced (14.5% vs

23.0%; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46–0.87;

p

= 0.005). However,

subgroup analyses revealed that for patients with a PSA

level at trial entry of

<

0.7 ng/ml, bicalutamide was not

superior to placebo in terms of 12-yr overall survival

(

p

= 0.53) or distant metastasis (

p

= 0.26).

Experts’ comments:

The RTOG 9601 trial provides evidence that bicalutamide

added to SRT improves overall survival in patients with PSA

0.7 ng/ml. However, these patients, together with the 11.8%

of patients who had a PSA nadir after surgery of 0.5 ng/ml,

probably harbored micrometastatic disease, which is likely to

be the reason for the increase in overall survival.

There is growing evidence that SRT should be applied

early, preferably for PSA levels

<

0.2 ng/ml

[1]

. The use of

bicalutamide appears not to be beneficial in more ‘‘early

salvage’’ patients (eg, PSA

<

0.7 ng/ml). The GETUG-16 trial

randomized 743 men, 80% of whom had PSA of

<

0.5 ng/ml,

to 66 Gy SRT alone versus SRT combined with 6 mo of a

luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone agonist and

revealed no overall survival benefit after combined

treatment

[2]

.

Dose-intensified SRT appears to be beneficial and well

tolerated

[1,3]

and early dose-intensified SRT alone may be

a better option for patients with a recurrent PSA level of

<

0.7 ng/ml. Genomic testing may further guide identifica-

tion of patients who might benefit from androgen depriva-

tion therapy or other additional treatments

[4]

. Metformin

(as being investigated in the SAKK 08/15 PROMET trial;

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02945813) or regional hyperthermia

[5]

may be effective and less toxic strategies for improving

the effectiveness of early SRT.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

[1]

Tendulkar RD, Agrawal S, Gao T, et al. Contemporary update of a multi-institutional predictive nomogram for salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:3648–54.

[2]

Carrie C, Hasbini A, de Laroche G, et al. Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:747–56

.

[3]

Ghadjar P, Hayoz S, Bernhard J, et al. Acute toxicity and quality of life after dose-intensified salvage radiation therapy for biochemi- cally recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy: first results of the randomized trial SAKK 09/10. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:4158–66.

[4]

Freedland SJ, Choeurng V, Howard L, et al. Utilization of a genomic classifier for prediction of metastasis following salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2016;70:588–96

.

[5]

Mu¨ ller AC, Zips D, Heinrich V, et al. Regional hyperthermia and moderately dose-escalated salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer. Protocol of a phase II trial. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:138.

Marcus Beck

a

, Stefanie Hayoz

b

, Pirus Ghadjar

a,

*

a

Charite´ Universita¨tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

b

SAKK Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland

*Corresponding author. Charite´ Universita¨tsmedizin Berlin,

Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

E-mail address:

pirus.ghadjar@charite.de

(P. Ghadjar).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.004

#

2017 European Association of Urology.

Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 3 1 5 – 3 2 0

319